Psycho
Flesh Eater
Reged: 05/14/01
Posts: 1480
Loc: Gilbert, AZ
|
|
I got a chance to check this one out yesterday. It's in limited release, and playing at only one theatre within a 100 mile radius of where I live. Overall I thought it was pretty damn good! There were a few creepy moments, and for the most part the acting felt natural. If there was one thing I didn't like though, is how sometimes the characters talk about the point the movie is trying to make, rather than just making it. It also has one of the coolest Amish characters I've ever seen (you'll see what I mean). If you get a chance, check it out. Those who weren't a fan of LAND OF THE DEAD may just find what they were missing in this one.
--------------------
----------
Psychos do not explode when sunlight hits them, I don't give a fuck how crazy they are!
-FROM DUSK TILL DAWN
|
EdgarAllen
Living Dead
Reged: 09/16/00
Posts: 1170
Loc: Star City
|
|
Been waiting for someone to chime in on this. The critics seem split on this one. I'm may get a chance to see it this week if things work out.Quote:
sometimes the characters talk about the point the movie is trying to make, rather than just making it
Have heard that other places as well, although I'm alot more psyched about this film's plot vs. LAND OF THE DEAD's smart zombies.
--------------------
"Thou shalt not be afraid for the terror by night; nor for the arrow that flieth by day;
Nor for the pestilence that walketh in darkness; nor for the destruction that wasteth at noonday."
-Psalms 91:5-6
|
Misfit
Living Dead
Reged: 10/24/00
Posts: 4806
Loc: Stuarts Draft,VA
|
|
I found it funny the decades later ingenius idea of Romero was "Smart Zombies", was that not Russo's vision all along that made them split up and make different sequels in the first place? (had ROTLD been less comical it still would have been frightening as shit).
I'd love to get stoked for this film but I really feel the first person handycam crap is not something I want to see a lot of.. Blair witch- it's new, Clover-field -it's fun but I feel sick... DOTD? I just don't think I could handle more.
|
Psycho
Flesh Eater
Reged: 05/14/01
Posts: 1480
Loc: Gilbert, AZ
|
|
Actually, the biggest difference between Diary and the other two films you mentioned, is that with Diary it's actually shot by a student who's first and foremost priority is to document the events. With Cloverfield (which I have not seen, only speculating) and Blair Witch, it was survival first, shoot second. Here, it's shoot first, survival second. Therefore there is no shaky cam. No blurry out of focused shots. When his friends are in trouble, he doesn't put down the camera to help. Instead he keeps a steady shot of what's going on.
--------------------
----------
Psychos do not explode when sunlight hits them, I don't give a fuck how crazy they are!
-FROM DUSK TILL DAWN
|
DanielSavage
Flesh Eater
Reged: 09/25/03
Posts: 1196
Loc: West Virginia
|
|
I live in the middle of nowhere so it's hard to tell how long I'll have to wait to see this movie. I don't really want to download it but if the wait is extremely long I'm afraid I will. Either way I'll buy it the day the dvd is released, good or bad...
--------------------
We won't crawl on our knees for you...
|
DriveInFan
Recently Deceased
Reged: 02/18/08
Posts: 11
Loc: Denver, CO
|
|
I was able to see this opening weekend; it is nice to have the Starz Film Center here in Denver. Between that and the four Landmark theaters here, we get to see most every art/independent film that opens.
I dug this movie, and as it continues to sink in I like it more and more. I love what George is saying about the media and I really dig seeing people on the move and trying to function. My favorite part of all zombie films is not the zombies, rather the way human beings relate to each other and how society falls apart, and Diary of the Dead is all about that!
|
Jaws
Living Dead
Reged: 06/13/00
Posts: 2170
Loc: NY
|
|
I thought this film was bad.
BAD!
BAD!
BAD!
BAD!
BAD!
Oh how the mighty have fallen.
|
MojoNexus
Flesh Eater
Reged: 10/22/01
Posts: 1077
Loc: Manhattan, KS USA
|
|
I bought it from a used bin, cheap. I thought it was fair at best, nothing new to see here. Not up to par with what I expected from G.R. Some of the worst acting I have seen in a long time. However, I also bought Left for Dead, a horror-western. OMG, that film REALLY sucked. So in comparison I actually enjoyed Diary. heh
--------------------
Lick my plate...
Mojo
My DVD collection!
|
DanielSavage
Flesh Eater
Reged: 09/25/03
Posts: 1196
Loc: West Virginia
|
|
I can totally see why you guys think the movie is bad, but you've got to keep the film's shoestring budget and independent status in mind. The acting is bad, but I've seen much worse. The special effects are mediocre, but I've seen much worse. The story isn't all that enveloping, but once again I've seen much worse.
I think Diary Of The Dead is a shining example of what it's supposed to be, and for a cheap ass independent horror film I think it's pretty solid. I know it isn't Romero's best, but it isn't his worst either. IMO Diary Of The Dead accomplished what Romero set out to do, and after viewing the film several times I still think it's a solid movie overall. It's nothing great, but it's not completely forgettable. I think if Romero was able to make Diary Of The Dead with the budget he had for Land Of The Dead it would've been epic. We'll never know for sure, but my hat's off to George for releasing a movie that he had a good time directing. Good for him...
--------------------
We won't crawl on our knees for you...
|
Jaws
Living Dead
Reged: 06/13/00
Posts: 2170
Loc: NY
|
|
Quote:
I think if Romero was able to make Diary Of The Dead with the budget he had for Land Of The Dead it would've been epic. We'll never know for sure, but my hat's off to George for releasing a movie that he had a good time directing. Good for him...
Land was bad also IMO. So with a big budget he fails. With his usual low budget he fails. G.R. has lost his touch. He has for some time IMO. I hope I don't offend anyone who likes the film but I just feel that Nobody with give this film a second thought. If this was the same movie only called Uwe boll's Diary of the Dead, people would be screaming how bad it was. Sorry I just feel that horror fans can't help but want to like whatever George puts out. I use to. But after these past two dead films I jus can't do it anymore.
|
DanielSavage
Flesh Eater
Reged: 09/25/03
Posts: 1196
Loc: West Virginia
|
|
Quote:
Quote:
I think if Romero was able to make Diary Of The Dead with the budget he had for Land Of The Dead it would've been epic. We'll never know for sure, but my hat's off to George for releasing a movie that he had a good time directing. Good for him...
Land was bad also IMO. So with a big budget he fails. With his usual low budget he fails. G.R. has lost his touch. He has for some time IMO. I hope I don't offend anyone who likes the film but I just feel that Nobody with give this film a second thought. If this was the same movie only called Uwe boll's Diary of the Dead, people would be screaming how bad it was. Sorry I just feel that horror fans can't help but want to like whatever George puts out. I use to. But after these past two dead films I jus can't do it anymore.
I'm going to have to ask that you kindly refrain from using George's name in the same context as Uwe Boll. That's fucking blashemy. While LOTD and Diary are both lackluster when compared to certain films they're both head and shoulders above ANYTHING that Uwe Boll has ever or will ever do. Land Of The Dead being a failure is just an opinion that hold as well my friend. While you may not like it, the film was far from a failure. Land Of The Dead grossed somewhere in the neighborhood of 46 million dollars. That's hardly a failure no matter how you look at it.
One thing that George has going for him is that he's got not one, but two timeless classics under his belt. The fact that he continues to work in the twilight years of his life is pretty fascinating as well. IMO Romero is among pretty prestigious company in the world of horror cinema. He is an icon...
--------------------
We won't crawl on our knees for you...
|
DanielSavage
Flesh Eater
Reged: 09/25/03
Posts: 1196
Loc: West Virginia
|
|
Sorry, but one sentence in my last post was supposed to read "Land Of The Dead being a failure is just an opinion that you hold as well my friend."
For some reason I couldn't edit the post...
--------------------
We won't crawl on our knees for you...
|
Jaws
Living Dead
Reged: 06/13/00
Posts: 2170
Loc: NY
|
|
Quote:
I'm going to have to ask that you kindly refrain from using George's name in the same context as Uwe Boll. That's fucking blashemy. While LOTD and Diary are both lackluster when compared to certain films they're both head and shoulders above ANYTHING that Uwe Boll has ever or will ever do. Land Of The Dead being a failure is just an opinion that hold as well my friend. While you may not like it, the film was far from a failure. Land Of The Dead grossed somewhere in the neighborhood of 46 million dollars. That's hardly a failure no matter how you look at it.
One thing that George has going for him is that he's got not one, but two timeless classics under his belt. The fact that he continues to work in the twilight years of his life is pretty fascinating as well. IMO Romero is among pretty prestigious company in the world of horror cinema. He is an icon...
I'm not really trying to say that George is not a better director then Uwe. He is. Just for the fact that he has NOTLD, DOTD, Martin, Creepshow, and to a lesser extent Day of the Dead.
But when you look at Diary of the Dead and Land of the Dead and compare them with those films, I'm sorry, It's not the same guy. Somthing has happend. He has lost his touch. And Diary really is in the Uwe Boll area of classic crap IMO.
And yes Land did fairly well. It was a very anticipated film by us Dead fans. But it Failed in my opinion as a dead film. It was not even close to his original works and was not even as good as the Night or Dawn remakes.
Again I say it's because these two films have George Romero's name on them that they get such a big pass. I know that opinions and tastes are different and it's all up to the viewer but I don't think there is any way that horror fans will be talking about Diary of the Dead a few years from now. Land may still get some love. Not sure how, screaming zombie gas attendents suck. But there seems to be a small cult following for that film. But I still say it's because of the George name on a Dead film.
|
Previous
Index
Next
Threaded
Edit
Reply
Quote
